Navier engineers, embedded in your program.

Talk to our team→See an engagement

Our engineers embed with your team to get AI working inside your engineering organization: running the studies, building the workflows around them, and leaving your people able to carry it on without us.

We run the platform we build.

Same engineers, same platform

The people on your engagement are the people who build and run Navier every day. No hand-off to a delivery team.

Your team learns it too

Kickoffs, design reviews, and working sessions where your engineers watch how the agents are driven, so the capability stays once the engagement ends.

You keep everything

Every study is delivered as an inspectable report with the case files behind it. The work is yours to rerun, extend, or audit.

Engagements built around the capacity and outcomes you need.

From a focused study to a long-term partnership, scale Navier support as your priorities evolve.

For a focused question

Single Engagement

  • One focused engineering problem or study
  • A scoped engagement measured in weeks, not quarters
  • See how we work before making a longer-term commitment

Per engagement

For a program with moving priorities

Ongoing Capacity

  • A longer engagement period with a standing team
  • On-demand support that extends your engineering team
  • Shift support as project priorities evolve
  • Optional on-site support for kickoffs, reviews, and working sessions

Monthly capacity · Longer-term commitment

For teams that want the platform too

Partner + Prism

  • Partnership or co-development engagements
  • Access to Prism, the agentic engineering environment we use internally to ship faster
  • Custom workflow and tooling development tailored to your team's needs
  • Priority access to Navier's future engineering and agent capabilities

Custom · Longer-term commitment

We scope it with you, run it, and hand back the work.

  1. Scope

    We start with the engineering question, the geometry, and the decision it feeds, then agree together on the studies, the operating conditions, and what a useful answer looks like.

  2. Run

    Navier engineers drive the agents: meshing, solver setup, execution, and post-processing, with the plan reviewed before anything runs.

  3. Review

    An engineer checks the results before they're called done, comparing against measurement where it exists and stating the claim boundary where it doesn't.

  4. Hand off

    You receive the report, the case files, and a recommendation, and on ongoing engagements we move straight to the next priority.

Results you can rerun, extend, and audit.

  • An engineering report: assumptions, mesh, boundary conditions, convergence, results, and plots
  • The case files behind every run, ready to rerun or extend
  • Run-to-run comparisons across the study
  • A recommendation, with its claim boundary stated
  • Working sessions with the engineers who did the work
Temperature field showing hot-air recirculation through a dense data-center cooling yard
DESIGN STUDY

Start here for what an engagement looks like.

Alternative layouts of the dry coolers around a data hall, compared on identical hardware, duty, and weather, and taken from geometry to a defensible recommendation.

Read the study→

Bring us the study you can't staff.

Tell us the engineering question and we'll come back with a scoped engagement.

Talk to our team→See our work